Research

Towards distributed upcycling approach

Motivation

See on the Website of ERPI

At the ERPI laboratory (https://erpi.univ-lorraine.fr/) of the Universiré de Lorraine, one major interest is the the development of methodologies, tools and case studies in the area of innovation process management. From engineering and design and territorial perspectives, the laboratory has been developing research on the intersection of additive manufacturing, circular economy and urban manufacturing.

One of the research axis concerns the intersection on three major societal issues as follows:

  1. The circular economy of plastics as disruptor paradigm in political, industrial and societal perspective (De Pascale et al. 2023; Ramli et al. 2024),

  2. The development of open design (Bakırlıoğlu and Kohtala 2019; Pacheco et al. 2025) including the open source technology as alternative approach of traditional technology development and,

  3. The experimental development of the urban manufacturing approaches (Herrmann et al. 2020; Ijassi et al. 2025) (i.e. Fablabs, Tiers Lieux, Recycleries and Matériauthèque) that usually are grassroot mouvements. These approaches are reframing the manufacturing networks at a local level and can give perspective on eco-innovation process for circular economy (Kasmi et al. 2021).

See for instance the LAUDS Factories EU Project

Indeed, current centralized waste management systems remain structurally inadequate (Lerpiniere et al. 2025) to address the complex and systemic nature of plastic pollution, a crisis that increasingly threatens planetary boundaries (Villarrubia-Gómez et al. 2024) and the safe operating space for humanity.

In this regard, ERPI Laboratory have been developing the concept of “distributed recycling via additive manufacturing (DRAM)” (Cruz Sanchez et al. 2020) as illustrated in Figure 1. It involves the technical feasibility of using recycled plastics into the additive manufacturing printing process chain. Particularly, the use systems based on material extrusion which are the most used in industry and general public.

alt
Figure 1: Distributed recycling via additive manufacturing developed at the ERPI Laboratory

The Recovery (I) phase addresses the logistical operations required to collect plastic waste for reuse within DRAM systems. The Preparation (II) phase encompasses the identification, separation, sorting, size reduction, and cleaning of plastic waste to ensure adequate quality. The Compounding (III) phase focuses on the development of mono- and composite materials. After, the Feedstock (IV) phase focuses on producing materials suitable for printing, either in filament form for FFF or as particles for FGF. The Printing (V) phase addresses application development and process optimization for recycled materials. Finally, the Quality (VI) phase involves multi-level technical characterization of recycled materials and printed parts.

Therefore, three major scales are simultaneaosly studied, as illustrated in Figure 1 :

  • Material level: The study of strategies for post-consumer plastic recycling/upcycling to enhance the structural properties of plastic waste.
  • Process level: Open-source hardware (i.e additive manufacturing, manual injection, sheetpress etc) as a promising pathway to transform plastic waste into usable artifacts/products.
  • Socio-technical level: Urban manufacturing systems can provide a conducive environment for distributed upcycling, enabling the transformation of plastic waste into locally relevant products, closer to where the waste is generated.

For instance, using desktop-scale fused filament fabrication (FFF) (Cruz Sanchez et al. 2014) and fused granular fabrication (FGF) (Alexandre et al. 2020), we have demonstrated their potential as technical enablers for the mechanical recycling of mono-thermoplastic waste, such as polylactic acid (PLA), from material (Cruz et al. 2015; Cruz Sanchez et al. 2017), process (Cruz Sanchez et al. 2014; Alexandre et al. 2020), and socio-technical perspectives (Santander et al. 2020; Caceres-Mendoza et al. 2023). Recently, the work on multi-material (Suescun Gonzalez et al. 2024; Gonzalez et al. 2025) have openend new explorative paths that aims to see the upcycling (Riondet et al. 2022) potential of this approach.

Material compatibilization as upcycling strategy

The incompatibility between different plastic types—due to variations in chemical and molecular structures—remains a major limitation, leading to poor interfacial adhesion and low material performance (Kassab et al. 2023). The aim in UP3DCYCLING is to fully develop an upcycling strategy targeting plastics that are sorted but not recycled due to the lack of viable value chains.

In this sense our mission is to investigate the mechanical upcycling of mixed plastic waste through the incorporation of compatibilizers during the melting process.
Our main outcome of is a comprehensive benchmarking of compatibilization strategies applied to the six primary single-use plastics: polyethylene terephthalate (PET), high density polyethylene (HDPE), polypropylene (PP), low density polyethylene (LDPE), polystyrene (PS) and polylactic acid (PLA).

The ambition is to establish a systematic framework defining minimum quality standards for additive manufacturing using blended recycled materials—an area that remains underdeveloped in current research.


Open source Fused Granular Fabrication as a promising technology for distributed upcycling

The use of open source additive manufacturing (aka 3D Printing) is revolutionizing the manner that plastics could be processed and transformed. In spite of the great promise of additive manufacturing as an advanced form of future manufacturing, there are still fundamental challenges with respect to sustainability that need to be addressed.

Our goal is on the instrumentation, adaptation and benchmarking of an open-source Fused Granular Fabrication system (Gonzalez et al. 2025) capable of processing heterogeneous waste blends. The mission is to optimize the FGF process for multi-material blends, integrating real-time monitoring and closed-loop control to enhance print quality and reliability


Urban Manufacturing as a socio-technical milieu to enable a distributed upcycling

Urban Manufacturing at Octroi Nancy. Source Octroi IG

UP3DCYCLING aims to explore distributed upcycling from a Design for Sustainability (DfS) perspective (Ceschin and Gaziulusoy 2019), focusing on its socio-technical implications. The project will adopt a mixed qualitative and quantitative approach to analyze urban upcycling systems. The broader implications of distributed upcycling as a sustainability transition remain insufficiently understood (Eising-Mertsch et al. 2024).

A participatory action research approach will be implemented through a real-world case study at the ‘Green Fablab’ in Nancy https://erpi.univ-lorraine.fr/projet/green-fablab/, developed since 2017 in close collaboration with local stakeholders, notably within the associative third place Octroi Nancy https://www.octroi-nancy.fr/. Within this framework, we will design and deploy an integrated workflow to collect, clean, sort, shred, and transform post-consumer plastic waste into new products via additive manufacturing, enabling the local valorization of materials currently excluded from conventional recycling systems (Cruz Sanchez et al. 2020; Santander et al. 2020; Caceres-Mendoza et al. 2023).

References

Alexandre, Arthur, Fabio A. Cruz Sanchez, Hakim Boudaoud, Mauricio Camargo, and Joshua M. Pearce. 2020. “Mechanical Properties of Direct Waste Printing of Polylactic Acid with Universal Pellets Extruder: Comparison to Fused Filament Fabrication on Open-Source Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers.” 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, April 24, 3dp.2019.0195. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2019.0195.
Bakırlıoğlu, Yekta, and Cindy Kohtala. 2019. “Framing Open Design Through Theoretical Concepts and Practical Applications: A Systematic Literature Review.” Human–Computer Interaction 34 (5–6): 389–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2019.1574225.
Caceres-Mendoza, Cristian, Pavlo Santander-Tapia, Fabio A. Cruz Sanchez, Nadège Troussier, Mauricio Camargo, and Hakim Boudaoud. 2023. “Life Cycle Assessment of Filament Production in Distributed Plastic Recycling via Additive Manufacturing.” Cleaner Waste Systems 5 (August): 100100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2023.100100.
Ceschin, Fabrizio, and İdil Gaziulusoy. 2019. Design for Sustainability: A Multi-Level Framework from Products to Socio-Technical Systems. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429456510.
Cruz, Fabio, Silvia Lanza, Hakim Boudaoud, Sandrine Hoppe, and Mauricio Camargo. 2015. “Polymer Recycling and Additive Manufacturing in an Open Source Context : Optimization of Processes and Methods.” Solid Freeform Fabrication (Austin, Texas), 1591–600.
Cruz Sanchez, Fabio A., Hakim Boudaoud, Mauricio Camargo, and Joshua M. Pearce. 2020. “Plastic Recycling in Additive Manufacturing: A Systematic Literature Review and Opportunities for the Circular Economy.” Journal of Cleaner Production 264 (August): 121602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121602.
Cruz Sanchez, Fabio A., Hakim Boudaoud, Sandrine Hoppe, and Mauricio Camargo. 2017. “Polymer Recycling in an Open-Source Additive Manufacturing Context: Mechanical Issues.” Additive Manufacturing 17 (October): 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.05.013.
Cruz Sanchez, Fabio Alberto, Hakim Boudaoud, Laurent Muller, and Mauricio Camargo. 2014. “Towards a Standard Experimental Protocol for Open Source Additive Manufacturing.” Virtual and Physical Prototyping 9 (3): 151–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2014.919553.
De Pascale, Angelina, Giuseppe Di Vita, Carlo Giannetto, et al. 2023. “The Circular Economy Implementation at the European Union Level. Past, Present and Future.” Journal of Cleaner Production 423 (October): 138658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138658.
Eising-Mertsch, Leonie, Paulo Savaget, Thayla Zomer, and Aoife Brophy. 2024. “Frames of Systems Change in Sustainability Transformations: Lessons from Sociotechnical Systems and Circular Economy Case Studies.” Journal of Cleaner Production 479 (November): 143976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143976.
Gonzalez, Catalina Suescun, Aditi Basdeo, Fabio A. Cruz Sanchez, Cécile Nouvel, Joshua M. Pearce, and Hakim Boudaoud. 2025. “Strategies for Recycling Multi-Material Polymer Blends for Additive Manufacturing.” Sustainable Materials and Technologies 44 (July): e01430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2025.e01430.
Herrmann, Christoph, Max Juraschek, Peter Burggräf, and Sami Kara. 2020. “Urban Production: State of the Art and Future Trends for Urban Factories.” CIRP Annals 69 (2): 764–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2020.05.003.
Ijassi, Walid, Damien Evrard, and Peggy Zwolinski. 2025. “Characterizing Value Chain Patterns of Urban Factories: A Case Study in the Grenoble Urban Area.” Journal of Cleaner Production 520 (August): 146061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146061.
Kasmi, Fedoua, Ferney Osorio, Laurent Dupont, Brunelle Marche, and Mauricio Camargo. 2021. “Innovation Spaces as Drivers of Eco-Innovations Supporting the Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Innovation Economics & Management Prépublica (0): Ij–XLII. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.pr1.0113.
Kassab, Ali, Dawood Al Nabhani, Pravansu Mohanty, Christopher Pannier, and Georges Y. Ayoub. 2023. “Advancing Plastic Recycling: Challenges and Opportunities in the Integration of 3D Printing and Distributed Recycling for a Circular Economy.” Polymers 15 (19): 3881. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15193881.
Lerpiniere, David J., David C. Wilson, and Costas A. Velis. 2025. “Official Development Finance in Solid Waste Management Reveals Insufficient Resources for Tackling Plastic Pollution: A Global Analysis of Two Decades of Data.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 212 (January): 107918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107918.
Pacheco, Jose Nicolas, Andreu Turro, and David Urbano. 2025. “Open Social Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 216 (July): 124160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124160.
Ramli, Abu Hanifah Mohammad, Latifah Abd. Manaf, Zufarzaana Zulkefli, and Sapto Andriyono. 2024. “Advancing Circular Economy Approaches in Plastic Waste Management: A Systematic Literature Review in Developing Economies.” Sustainable Production and Consumption, ahead of print, August 22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.08.018.
Riondet, Lucas, Maud Rio, Véronique Perrot-Bernardet, and Peggy Zwolinski. 2022. “For an Upscaling Assessment Integration in Product Design.” Procedia CIRP, 32nd CIRP Design Conference (CIRP Design 2022) - Design in a changing world, vol. 109 (January): 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.219.
Santander, Pavlo, Fabio A Cruz Sanchez, Hakim Boudaoud, and Mauricio Camargo. 2020. “Closed Loop Supply Chain Network for Local and Distributed Plastic Recycling for 3D Printing: A MILP-Based Optimization Approach.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 154 (March): 104531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104531.
Suescun Gonzalez, Catalina, Fabio A. Cruz Sanchez, Hakim Boudaoud, Cécile Nouvel, and Joshua M. Pearce. 2024. “Multi-Material Distributed Recycling via Material Extrusion: Recycled High Density Polyethylene and Poly (Ethylene Terephthalate) Mixture.” Polymer Engineering & Science n/a (n/a). https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.26643.
Villarrubia-Gómez, Patricia, Bethanie Carney Almroth, Marcus Eriksen, Morten Ryberg, and Sarah E. Cornell. 2024. “Plastics Pollution Exacerbates the Impacts of All Planetary Boundaries.” One Earth 7 (12): 2119–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.10.017.